Interestingly, the Chinese versions of the two most prominent business newspapers in the world, which are the Financial Times and the Wall Street Journal, have been competing quite a lot in China.

And also interestingly, on a related note, an author may get his articles published often at cn.WSJ.com , but never gets them onto WSJ.com .

Some SNS users' recommendations chime with my need to be on top of important things. But they put out dense information too frequently. Sigh.

I've never come to really understand why so many classic music lovers are so Mozartian.

A person's judiciousness usually takes another's wisdom to appreciate. And not only what he's done, but also what he hasn't.

In Montreal, sort of unskillful are some, or many, cooks in Chinese food restaurants and outlets.

The temperance never ceases to amaze me which Americans and Canadians show in their expression of sadness of losing one or more of their dear ones.

It's nearly obvious that even if RIM will manage to survive in the face of the challenges put out by Apple and Google, it will only squeak through, even in the overseas markets.

Well, I've begun to doubt the competence of some economists or analysts on the Bay Street. They're still voicing that RIM's market shares in emerging markets economies have been improving although that in the U.S. has been sagging, and hence RIM is a buy.

Well, isn't it obvious that the consumers in the above mentioned emerging markets will get informed and become to know better and then follow the suit of savvy American consumers and choose iPhone and Android devices over Blackberry?

Gee, those economists / analysts. Were they speaking their personal true opinions?