This blog is partly devoted to the sharing of my learning of the English language (my well mastered mother tongue is Chinese and I am not an English teacher) and its *cultures*, partly to the current significant trends in Canada and in the world, and partly to my own random thoughts and little life. I am not religious, but I am somewhat interested in Christianity and Buddhism, among other personal interests. Welcome. And, have a good day.
Thursday, April 11, 2013
Tuesday, April 9, 2013
Monday, April 8, 2013
Life isn't easy for non-state-owned Chinese firms.
Inside China, the omnipresent and overbearing governments are apt to mistreat them.
Outside China, foreign governments will potentially clamp down on them more and more.
Canny innovations happen everywhere and everyday.
The thing is, mainly industry insiders know and are capable to discern them.
There're many interesting points about the seizure and trial of Adolf Eichmann by Israel during early 1960s.
First let's be clear that we just don't concern ourselves with the disputes between Argentina and Israel. (See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eichmann#International_dispute_over_capture.) And we just talk about things between Mr. Adolf Eichmann, an individual, and Israel, a state.
Personally I don't know anything about the study of law. But the particular case intrigues me, in terms of law.
Point 1: Israel captured Eichmann by kidnapping him in Argentina. That act of arresting an individual by way of illegal means seems to be ADMISSIBLE in Israeli justice system, even in international legal system.
Point 2: During the trial, Israel allegedly followed an alleged meticulous due process. For that matter, it seems to me that in many Western judicial systems, due processes dictate that evidences obtained through illegal methods are NOT ADMISSIBLE.
A rather intriguing law case.
Personally I don't know anything about the study of law. But the particular case intrigues me, in terms of law.
Point 1: Israel captured Eichmann by kidnapping him in Argentina. That act of arresting an individual by way of illegal means seems to be ADMISSIBLE in Israeli justice system, even in international legal system.
Point 2: During the trial, Israel allegedly followed an alleged meticulous due process. For that matter, it seems to me that in many Western judicial systems, due processes dictate that evidences obtained through illegal methods are NOT ADMISSIBLE.
A rather intriguing law case.
Sunday, April 7, 2013
Saturday, April 6, 2013
Friday, April 5, 2013
Thursday, April 4, 2013
Wednesday, April 3, 2013
Tuesday, April 2, 2013
Monday, April 1, 2013
Saturday, March 30, 2013
Wow, the nascent so-called bank account tax for Cypriot bank accounts appears to just violate people's rights to private property.
Where's the line between public property and private property?
Friday, March 29, 2013
During the time of China's Ming and Qing dynasties, how differently did the Western royalties' courts look from their Chinese counterparts?
And, much more importantly, how differently did the former work from the latter?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)